Project
2
Guidance -
Testing
|
TESTING
This section has a total of 7 marks allocated to it, which are spread out
amongst its different aspects.
Within the Analysis section, candidates should have listed a number of things
the potential user wants the system to be able to do. This list should form
the basis of the testing strategy that they now employ.
TESTING - Describe their Testing
This sub-section has a total of 4 marks allocated to it. In order to gain any
mark candidates must achieve the previous marking point.
1 mark
- Provide evidence that they have carried out at
least one test of their solution.
- Candidates will print out the results of a test. They will write down
the test, which might, at this level, be a straightforward search which was
outlined in the Analysis Section.
2 marks
- Provide evidence of, and describe at least two
tests used to test their solution.
- For example on a database, in addition to performing another search
there has to be a description of the test and what the candidate is trying
to achieve. The results of the tests will accompany the description.
3 marks
- Provide evidence of, and describe the tests used
to thoroughly test their solution.
- This is a lot more difficult as there has to be evidence as well as
descriptions of tests used to ensure that all aspects, database,
spreadsheet, word processing etc. are working well. This will include
validation checks as well.
- To satisfy the requirement of “thoroughly testing”, it is expected that
ALL user specified tasks listed in the Analysis section will be tested and
commented upon.
4 marks
- Provide evidence of, and describe the tests used
to thoroughly test their solution. Including testing from the point of view of
the user.
- This requires the user or somebody acting as the user to test the
solution. The key thing is to get critical feedback from the user otherwise
the mark cannot be awarded.
- The opinions of the user will have to be documented. Some form of
response sheet would be in order.
TESTING - Describe the Results
This sub-section has a total of 3 marks allocated to it, which are spread out
amongst its different aspects. In order to gain any mark candidates must achieve
all the previous marking point.
1 mark
- List the actual results of the tests. List the
expected results of the tests.
- Candidates need to provide the expected results as well as the actual
results. For every test they have carried out they will need to do this.
2 marks
- Compare the actual results with the expected
results.
- This requires some form of description from the candidates about the
outcome.
- On most occasions there will be very little comment on what happened as
the two sets of results will be identical. Candidates, however, must make
comment on the rare occasion when this is not the case. They must include
examples of this to gain this mark. A possible example is the typing in of
wrong formulae into a spreadsheet.
3 marks
- Compare the actual results with the expected
results. Explain their choice of test data.
- Candidates have to list their test data and explain why they are using
that particular data. With such tests as validation checks they will
obviously have to choose some invalid data to prove that the check works.
|